🔗 Share this article

Families of people buried in graves at risk from shoreline retreat state that a lack of decision over how to tackle the issue is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being consumed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A recent report on the issue sets out a range of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer locations. Officials say it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They intended this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Past

One resident recalled a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves looking for treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril

Along the coast is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while working overseas. His parent said she lost sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to think this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

An absence of consensus over when and how to tackle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families are calling for additional coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit burials to continue for now. Others contend the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with residents.”

He added there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. It requires good local conversations to find the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the physical loss of sacred ground.